Creating a new constitution
posted by Dale Dodge, with information from Suresh Shrestha
After 6 years of democratic government, the government of Nepal has been unable to get the job done of writing a constitution. There are too many parties, too many vested interests, and too little power. The following is the final question and answer from an interview with Lok Raj Baral, author and political science professor in Nepal.
Question: You touched on many aspects of governance. It will soon be a year since the formation of the government under Sushil Koirala. How would you assess its performance?
Mr. Baral’s response: This government has not done anything; it has been a non-functioning government. It was barely able to even appoint ambassadors. It failed to expedite the constitution and it has not been actively inclusive. It has been a failure. But I would not just blame Sushil Koirala. It was the same during the tenure of Prachanda and Baburam Bhattarai.
This is a fault of the system. There is no single-party majority so any government needs to take other parties along with it. So either you need to satisfy your coalition partner or you need a prime minister with the personality to do what needs to be done. But I also don’t know what the alternative is. Furthermore, we are forced to deal with multiple crises at the same time—governance crisis, leadership crisis, constitutional crisis, corruption crisis, etc. And none of the parties abide by their ideologies. The NC is not socialist, the UML is not Leninist-Marxist, and the Maoists are not Maoist. That is why we need a minimum understanding between the major parties.
Harsh words, but echoed in the report sent to us recently by Suresh Shrestha, our TSS partner in Manthali.
Continue reading “The rocky road of political change: Nepal’s challenges”